beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.06.26 2014구합22427

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On December 5, 2006, the Plaintiff first entered the Republic of Pakistan with the status of sojourn for industrial training (D-3) on December 5, 2006, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on January 22, 2013, which is two days before the expiration of the period of sojourn ( January 24, 2013).

On March 4, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no “probably-founded fear of persecution” (see Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act (Amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 28, 2014, but was dismissed on December 16, 2014.

[Based on recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition and the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the argument as to whether the instant disposition is legitimate, the Plaintiff was working as a member of the organization, namely, Nunni Trek, from the origin of Pakistan Punja (Bhalwal) region. On April 13, 2012, the Plaintiff demanded on the religious event held by the said organization to find out 10 to 12, to threaten the Plaintiff’s punishment (B) and discontinue the religious event, and not to engage in the hydropa organization activities.

In addition, on April 15, 2012, the Plaintiff, 1, 200, and 5, from among the Do, where the Plaintiff, 3, and 4 were on the house, were on a shooting to Plaintiff 1.

(2) The Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee even though there was a fear that the Plaintiff had sufficient grounds for stuffing for religious reasons when the Plaintiff returned to Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “the instant threat”). The instant disposition is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

The following shall be recognized by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to each statement in subparagraphs 3 and 4 of this paragraph: