손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The plaintiff's assertion as to the plaintiff's assertion argues that the defendant, while holding office as the management director of the hospital operated by the plaintiff, embezzled the management expenses of the hospital operated by the plaintiff several times, and in this regard, the plaintiff is obligated to pay each of the above amounts by preparing and granting a confirmation letter to the plaintiff that he will pay 10 million won and 37 million won and 20 million won, so that he/she is obligated to pay the above amounts in total.
Judgment
According to the statement in 1, 2, and 3 of the evidence Nos. 1-1, 1-2, and 3, the defendant confirmed to the plaintiff as of February 27, 2005 the amount of KRW 100 million to be repaid to the plaintiff as of June 20, 2005, the letter of confirmation that the defendant will be repaid to the plaintiff by June 20, 2005, ② the letter of confirmation that the amount of KRW 37 million as of August 26, 2005 will be repaid by November 30, 2005, ③ as of July 4, 2006, the letter of commitment that the defendant will be repaid to the plaintiff within 15 days at the same time with the cancellation of the guarantee against the guarantor of the Promissory Notes in the name of the plaintiff (the amount of KRW 200 million issued) as of July 4, 2006.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to repay each of the above agreements to the plaintiff, unless there are special circumstances.
As to the defendant's defense, the defendant decided to pay the original amount of KRW 137 million on January 3, 2005, the defendant paid the amount of KRW 21 million on April 1, 2005, and KRW 79 million on April 1, 2005, and the remaining amount of KRW 37 million on the defendant's defense, the defendant prepared the above third letter of commitment as to KRW 17 million and the remaining amount of KRW 20 million. However, the defendant agreed to resolve the problems at the plaintiff's hospital and resolve the remaining amounts of KRW 20 million, and thus the defendant's debt was all extinguished.
Judgment
As seen earlier, the difference between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s assertion regarding the amount of the original Defendant’s debt (157 million won and 137 million won).