However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a police officer of the first instance, stating that “a loan could be available and a transaction record should be created because of lack of transaction records; (b) money should be deposited to a staff sent by us to us; and (c) he was aware that the money deposited into the Defendant’s account was acquired by criminal act, such as Bophing, and that the money was not normally acquired; (c) accepted the said proposal; and (d) transmitted the account passbook in the name of the Defendant to C by photographing the account number.

Around February 26, 2019, an employee in the name light of the license refers to a false statement to the effect that “the Government-funded loan can be made at low interest, and if the existing loan is repaid, it is possible to make a deposit to the account designated by us.” On February 27, 2019, the employee in the name light of the license shall transfer three million won from the victim to the corporate bank account in the name of the above defendant on February 12:33, 2019. On February 28, 2019, the employee in the name light of the license shall be taken over at low interest and shall be called “the Government-funded loan may be made at low interest,” and “the Government-funded loan may be made at a low interest rate of up to 62 million won if the existing loan is repaid, and deposit to the bank account designated by us shall be transferred from the victim to the above bank account in the name of 300,000 won on February 36, 2019.”

On February 27, 2019, the Defendant deposited three million won in D’s name with the foregoing account around 12:33, the Defendant, at around 13:07 on the same day, withdrawn in cash the above three million won from the first cash withdrawal period of a corporate bank I branch located in H in the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, on three occasions at around 14:00 on the same day after withdrawing in cash on three occasions at around 14:0 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to name.