beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.30 2014가합59991

공유자우선매수청구권 존재확인

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and its ASEAN owned the land as indicated in [Attachment] [Attachment]-ownership relation [Attachment]-ownership relation [Attachment]-ownership relation 1] / [Attachment Table 2] / [Attachment Table 2] / [Attachment C] / [Attachment C] / [Attachment C] / [Attachment C] / [Attachment C] 1] / [Attachment C] 17/180 shares (Plaintiff) 17/180 shares (F) 17/180 shares (C) / 4 shares (F) prior to G 3 Gwangju-si 3, 17/180 shares (F) / 17/180 shares (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) / [Attachment C] 1/3 shares (Plaintiffs) 2/3 shares (C) prior to G 5-si, 3 Gwangju-si, 15-si, 5-si, 3-si, 5-si, 10222 square meters and 300,000 won,000 won,00 won,00 won,00

B. (1) On June 9, 201, Hyundai Switzerland Savings Bank Co., Ltd. filed an application for the auction of real estate rent with respect to each of the instant lands, including the Plaintiff’s shares and the instant land Nos. 1, 3, and 4, as a result of the aforementioned collateral security (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”) with the Suwon District Court’s Sung-nam Branch Branch Branch of Sung-nam Branch of the said district court. (2) On June 10, 201, the said court rendered a decision to commence the auction of real estate rent (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”) on each of the instant lands on June 10, 201.

C. The above court, while conducting the auction procedure of this case with respect to various real estate owned by C, including C’s shares in each of the instant land, made a decision to collectively sell C’s shares in the instant land and land No. 1, and made a decision to collectively sell C’s shares in the instant land No. 2 and the instant land No. 3 and 4. Thus, the instant land No. 1’s shares in the instant land No. 1 and the instant land No. 1’s ownership in the instant land No. 1 and the instant land No. 2 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each land of this case’s auction property No. 2”).

....