However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

1. Defendant A, who had completed the marriage report with D on July 9, 1991, was a spouse who was married, around October 22, 2009, 01:30 on October 22, 2009, Defendant A’s studio 304 of the Defendant’s studio in Kimhae-si, and Defendant B’s studio.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of Defendant A, the Defendant had been sexual intercourse with Defendant A once, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the recipient certificate, on-site photographs, site rents, and marriage relation certificate;

1. Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;