2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant was the first offender who has no criminal history, and his mistake is divided, and the farmland has been restored to its original state.

However, the size of the diverted farmland, the height of the filled-up is not small, and the defendant has restored the farmland to its original state upon receiving a summary order of KRW 10 million as the instant case. In full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the offense, method, method and consequence of the offense, circumstances before and after the offense, and criminal record relation, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is groundless.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.