임대료 등 청구의 소
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where a part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of
[Supplementary Use] Part 2 and Part 15 of Part 2, " until March 14, 2019," " from March 15, 2017 to March 14, 2019."
The Defendant asserts that “The Defendant, according to the evidence Nos. 1 and 15 of the evidence No. 5, left the commercial building of this case on or before June 2017, and there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that the building of this case was delivered to the Plaintiff before March 31, 2018)” of No. 1-3 of the 4th page “The Defendant agreed to terminate the lease agreement with the Plaintiff around June 2017, and delivered the building of this case to the Plaintiff.”
According to the purport of Eul evidence No. 2’s film and oral argument, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the defendant left the commercial building of this case after leaving the building of this case with only some things, such as the front line, left the building of this case; and (b) the plaintiff sent the key to the commercial building of this case to the plaintiff; (c) the plaintiff requested a new lessee at the defendant’s responsibility and attached the advertisement for which the new lessee was sought on the commercial building of this case; (d) however, according to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1, No. 5-1, and No. 15, the whole statement and oral argument of evidence No. 15, the plaintiff carried out the lease business of the commercial building of this case on the premise that the defendant should be paid rent, management fee, etc. after June 2017; and (e) from June 2017, 2017 to August 16, 2018, the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant on the lease deposit and rent, etc. can be acknowledged as above.