When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-si.

On July 24, 2014, the Defendant driving the above taxi on July 16:30, and driving the two-lane road in front of the Seoul Changwon Elementary School located in 103, Dobong-gu, Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes of the two-lane roads in front of the Seoul Changwon Elementary School.

Since there are crosswalks where signal lights are installed and are designated as children protection zones, drivers have the duty of care to check whether there is any person who gets on the way to reduce speed and check the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are well, to drive safely according to the signals and pay attention to the safety of children.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and tried to go beyond the ground by taking the victim C (nine years of age) who cross the crosswalk from the left side of the vehicle driving direction to the right side in accordance with pedestrian signals due to the negligence of proceeding, even though the vehicle driving signal was stopped.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as double alleys, which require approximately six weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A traffic accident report (the actual survey report);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1, 6, and 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant violated the stop signal within the children's protection zone, while driving on the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals, is relatively serious injury to the victim.