폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it; (b) the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses in contingency; (c) the victim did not want the punishment any longer due to the agreement with the victim; (d) the Defendant committed a second offense even during the period of a repeated crime of the same kind; and (e) the Defendant committed several times, including the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of offense; and (e) the Defendant has more records of committing a second offense, such as the type and content of the instant offense, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc., the sentence set by the lower court at the statutory lower court is too unreasonable.
Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.