When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant, at the victim’s request, expressed the victim’s attitude to “Isp, Ispher, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere, Isphere.”

2. On the 22th day of the same month, around 10:16, the victim called the above victim for the above reasons, and expressed the attitude that “I expect that I would see the c, N, and I would have been faced with the c, D, I expect that I would see the c, E, E, E, E, E, I would like to know what humans are human beings, and what you would expect, and how I would like to see how I would like to harm the life, body, etc. of the victim.”

3. On the 22th of the same month, at around 19:34, the victim called the above victim for the above reasons, "I wish to know, respond to, and dynas, to dynas, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, why we want to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, and to see, to see, to see, to see, how we want to cause harm to the life, body, etc. of the victim."

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;