손해배상(기)
1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) regarding the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court’s reasoning in this case is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act [the second period period period period, which the defendant under the contract of this case can function as a mass product that can be sold at the time for the plaintiff’s delivery exhibition (the first period of January 20, 2019, but the plaintiff extended once on January 28, 2019)] is to deliver to the plaintiff by the agreed date, namely, the duty to hand over the plaintiff as a regular act, that is, the defendant bears the duty to hand over to the plaintiff as a result of a sufficient trial operation period before the due date, and it appears that the work to improve the dgging and working through a sufficient trial operation period was virtually essential to achieve the purpose as a regular act under the contract of this case (Article 6-1 of the evidence), and it is difficult to view that the plaintiff is obliged to take the duty of guidance 2 of the plaintiff under the contract of this case.
In consideration of B, even if the evidence examined by this court was neglected, it is difficult to change the fact-finding or judgment of the first instance judgment. 2. Then, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and all appeals filed by the Defendant as to the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.