도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime and is against the law.
Defendant has family members to be supported.
This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.
However, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for 8 months due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and committed the instant crime again during the said period. The alcohol concentration in the blood of the instant crime is relatively high to 0.132%.
This is disadvantageous to the defendant.
In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances before and after committing a crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.