If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

피고인은 2013. 7. 10. 10:30경 대전 대덕구 C에 있는 D 예식장 앞 노상에서 대덕구청 주차단속 공무원인 피해자 E(남, 52세)가 F 스타렉스 차량이 횡단보도에 주차되어 있으니 이동해 줄 것을 요구하자 피해자에게 “이 씹할 새끼들, 누가 골목까지 주차단속 하라고 시켰어, 개새끼야 나는 구청장, 시장도 겁 안나, 뒤지고 싶냐”라고 욕설을 하며 주먹으로 안면을 1회 때려 주차단속 업무 등에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해함과 동시에 피해자에게 약 14일간의 치료를 요하는 귀의 타박상, 귓바퀴의 표재성 손상, 박리, 찰과상 등의 상해를 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserted that it constitutes a justifiable act as a passive act to escape from illegal performance of official duties, on the grounds that the Defendant was the victim’s speech several times, and E was a “satisf in the police box,” and he was friendly with bather batf, and thus, he was friendly.

According to the evidence, it can be recognized that public officials E, at the time, performed a legitimate parking control without having expressed a desire to the defendant, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.