beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.01.24 2017나23608

사해행위취소 등

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, it is reasonable to cite this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the court of first instance, other than using the corresponding parts under the judgment of first instance as follows.

2. Parts 2, Nos. 12, 4, and 20 of the Parts 2, 2, and 4, “ May 31, 2017,” respectively, shall be deemed to be “ December 13, 2017,” respectively, and KRW 42,58,493, and KRW 43,87,260, respectively.

In full view of the evidence Nos. 2 through 10, evidence Nos. 2-1, 2-2, appraisal results, and the overall purport of the pleadings by appraiser I of the first instance trial, the value of the instant real estate as of May 10, 2017, which was 334,476,250, which was the time of the closing of pleadings in the first instance trial. Meanwhile, the value of the instant real estate as of May 10, 2017, which was 334,476,250, among the instant real estate, was established on March 9, 207 with respect to the land and buildings in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan District Court, the debtor H, the debtor H, 28,600,000 won, until the date of establishment of a mortgage, which was 10,000 won or more, and the remaining value of the instant real estate, which was 0,000 won or more, should not be recognized as having been disposed of within the extent of the amount of a mortgage.