양수금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. Pursuant to the First Preliminary Claim added by this Court, the Defendant shall be the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. Around January 8, 2015, between the Defendant and the company for the purpose of housing construction business, etc., a company for the purpose of family industry planning, etc. related to reconstruction (hereinafter referred to as “ home industry”) provided services to the association established for the said business by proxy, etc. with respect to the housing reconstruction project of Jinju apartment located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, by having the Defendant select as a contractor, etc., and entered into a business agreement with the content that would receive the service cost calculated at a certain rate in return. On January 26, 2015, the same business agreement was concluded with respect to the housing redevelopment project in the Doe One District in the Namyang-si City and the urban environment rearrangement project in the Hanyang-si District in the Namyang-si city in South
(B) The business agreement has been amended once more, but the main contents are the same).
From January 5, 2015, the Defendant presented the conditions that each association will bear expenses, etc. necessary to hold a general meeting to select a construction project. On January 31, 2015, the general meeting of the Jinju Apartment Apartment Housing Reconstruction Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Jinju Apartment Housing Association”) and the Housing Redevelopment Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Doe one Housing Development Project Association”) was selected as the contractor at the general meeting of the Gu Won-si District Urban Environment Improvement Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Gu Won-gu Urban Environment Improvement Association”) around February 14, 2015, and concluded a contract for each association and construction project (a) around March 2015.
C. For the purpose of holding a general meeting to select the construction works of each union, the Asian industry entered into a contract for business services or supply of goods from the pertinent company from January 4, 2015 to January 13, 2015, such as D, E, E, petter Co., Ltd., E, E, and E, Ltd., and E, Ltd., to be provided with services or goods, and accordingly, paid the price to some companies or bear the obligation to pay the price to some companies.
The plaintiff on 2016.