2. The facts that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case as well as reflects his mistake, and that the defendant showed a summary intention and did not repeat the crime are favorable circumstances.

On the other hand, in light of the addiction of narcotics and the harmful effects caused by medication of narcotics, etc., the crime of this case needs to be strictly punished and eradicated, and the defendant has a history of criminal punishment several times, and in particular, on April 12, 2013, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten years for a crime of narcotics, who was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a crime of narcotics on April 12, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive during the suspended sentence of one year for a crime of narcotics again, and the above suspended sentence became null and void, and the defendant repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crimes without being aware of the completion of the execution of

In full view of the above circumstances and all other factors of sentencing as indicated in the pleadings of this case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, means and consequence of a crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.