명예훼손
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.
1. Defendant A, a public lawsuit office, was sent to the 18th executive election of D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) implemented on February 13, 2016, and was dispatched to the 18th executive election of D (hereinafter referred to as “D”), and was elected by the following: Defendant B, as a member of D, was working as Defendant A’s election campaign team for the interest of Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “E”).
A. In relation to the 18th executive election of D, the Defendants conspired to prepare and distribute printed materials that may cause misunderstanding to the members who are not aware of the overall contents, by preventing them from being reappointed by the victim F, who is the incumbent chief director, as “the chief director,” and by extracting only a part of the contents unfavorable to the victim, in order to make the Defendant A and the members who were aware of the contents of the case elected as the candidate for the “the chief director,” with respect to the 18th executive election of D.
Accordingly, Defendant B’s reason for resignation of the F president at his office located in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building 201, on a temporary and irregular basis;
1. Business losses of not less than one billion won (business losses in 2013: -Won 579,411,223, 2014: Won -Won - 476,712,700;
2. Forgery of minutes of the extraordinary general meeting (a false report to the National Federation on the procedure and details of resolution which have not run as of November 13, 2015, on which a signature or seal is affixed);
3. The F's annual salary for the president himself/herself shall be 65% damp (the increase of KRW 9.6 million from KRW 5.8 million in 2013) reduction in the members' dividends (the dividend of KRW 00 in 2014);
4. Flaging its members (inception of printed matter with free gifts, stude);
5. Along with the end of January 2016, he/she prepared a printed article stating "in the standing director receiving an annual salary of a large amount of annual salary" and delivered it to Defendant A, Defendant A around February 16, 2016, and Defendant A divided the printed article in the old-ro market located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 3, 2016, into part of the printed article on the Gu-ro market located in Guro-gu, Seoul.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other to damage the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.
B. The purpose of Defendant B’s sole crime is to defame a person.