임금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. According to the record as to the legitimacy of the subsequent appeal, since the document of lawsuit, including a duplicate of the complaint of the first instance, and the original copy of the judgment, are served to the defendant by means of service by public notice, and the defendant becomes aware of the fact that the defendant was not aware of the lawsuit of this case and the judgment of the court of first instance, it can be recognized that the subsequent appeal of this case was filed within two weeks from the date of
2. Basic facts
A. The plaintiffs were the team members of the D Team of the sales agency, among the sales agency teams belonging to Dock Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Dock"), which conduct real estate sales agency business, etc., and the defendant was the team leader of the said team.
Furthermore, the corporation is the executor of the building project of F, a commercial building of the fifth floor above the second floor above the ground in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant commercial building”). D, on April 2015, L, P, P, P, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, and C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, and C, C, C, C, C, C,
B. On April 2015, the Plaintiffs entered into a service contract with the Rack to perform the sales agency business of the instant shopping district as the Rack’s sales agent and the Rack to pay the sales commission equivalent to 3.5% of the sales price to the sales agency team to which the Plaintiffs belong.
On April 2015, the plaintiffs were 2.5% of the sales commission (3.5% of the sales price) that the plaintiffs and the above sales agency team belonging to the defendant receive from Dock, and the defendant were to divide the amount equivalent to the remaining one% of the sales commission (=Plaintiff A1.25% of the sales price) and the defendant.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence 5, 8, 10, 11, Eul's evidence 4 through 6, and 14, Gap's testimony at the trial court G, the purport of the whole pleadings
3. Duty to pay a sales commission;
(a)each entry in Party A’s Evidence Nos. 4 to 7, and Party B’s Evidence No. 17, on the basis of the facts of recognition, without dispute, and