When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 24, 2017, at around 01:05, the Defendant reported that the Defendant 112 was drunkly driven on the front side of the “C” located in Busan YYB, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Busan YY Hamb, and reported that the Defendant was drunk, and (b) took part in the body fighting with the Defendant’s daily driving division of the Defendant, and (c) Ham F was tightly pushed up three times with the Defendant’s daily driving division on three occasions by the horse’s hand; (d) the Defendant walked the upper part of the Defendant’s chest; (e) the Defendant walked the upper part of his left part on two occasions by drinking; and (e) the Defendant continued to take part in the upper part of the F with the two hand, was tightly pushed up three times in volume, tight, bucking the bridge, skeing the bucking part, and trike the left part.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the defendant committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol, the degree of tangible force exercised by police officers, and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is serious;

It is difficult to see that the Defendant had no record of criminal punishment in addition to the previous conviction of a fine imposed once prior to the instant crime.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;