A. A. It was only when the victim of misunderstanding of facts was dead, but did not inflict an injury upon him.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in the erroneous determination of facts, it can be recognized that the defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as cerebral celebrat, etc. requiring three weeks medical treatment, as shown in the facts charged, so this part of

B. In full view of the various sentencing conditions and the fact that there is no agreement with the victim as indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case of unfair sentencing, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.