For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that found the Defendants not guilty on the charge of this case by determining that there was no proof of crime.

Even if examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the status of the custodian of embezzlement, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.