On November 19, 2011, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol and even though it seems that the Defendant would pay the price at the “Dju” operated by the Victim C in Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim was provided with alcohol, alcohol, etc.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcoholic beverage and entertainment services equivalent to KRW 800,000 in total from the victim’s place.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property and property benefits by deceiving the victim.

In addition, the Defendant, from that time until February 15, 2012, received a total of 25,200,000 won from the victim by the same method as stated in the attached list of crimes, and acquired property and pecuniary gains equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Application of a certified copy of a notarial deed and a receipt copy;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. In full view of the facts that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders are divided into his errors, and the amount of damage is not so much and the amount of damage has not yet been fully repaid, the sentence of sentence is inevitable.

In addition, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the criminal records, the criminal records of the defendant, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various circumstances shown in the oral proceedings shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the text.