2. The judgment of the court below that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case at the court below, and that the taxi fee acquired by deception is minor, but the crime of this case is deemed to have been charged to the cab that the victim drives despite the lack of payment ability. In full view of the fact that the defendant had been punished several times as the crime of this case, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence, etc., the punishment of the court below sentenced is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.