However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 09:15 on October 10, 2015, the Defendants discovered the Defendants’ husband E (the 43-year-old) who was the victim of the Defendant’s husband of the Defendant Party B in the Moel, and got on the Fabur-purged car owned by the Defendant A, Defendant A, the driver who driven away, and the victim was driving the frontway as it is in order to interfere with the operation of the said vehicle, and caused the victim to go up to the said 1.4 km in the above condition, and continued to operate the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use a passenger car, which is a dangerous object, to assault the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of on-site photographs and statutes governing damage photographs;

1. Articles 261, 260 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (including the progress leading to the case, the fact that the victim withdraws his/her criminal complaint against B, and the criminal records);