beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2018.09.19 2018고단84

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

The defendant will pay 285,00 won to the applicant by deceitation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on November 4, 2017 at the Port Prison.

[2018 Highest 84] On February 2, 2018, the Defendant connected to the “open Market”, an Internet goods transaction site at the Yannam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and posted a notice to the victim D around that time, stating that he would sell the said goods to the victim via the Kakao Stockholm, and received KRW 230,000 as the price for the same day from the victim who believed that he would sell the said goods to the victim through the said website.

However, even if the defendant received the above money, he did not have the intent or ability to sell the goods agreed upon to by the victim.

As such, the Defendant, including by deceiving the victim to acquire the equivalent amount of the above money, from that time, was the same year.

4. The goods are sold to those who wish to purchase secondhand goods, which were known through the Internet goods trading site, such as the list of offenses set out in attached Table 1 at the place of Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, etc. from the date of February 23.

In this way, 38 victims acquired 5,272,50 won in total as the price for each item from the account of the defendant's agricultural bank and the National Bank.

[2018 Highest 119] On February 4, 2018, the Defendant sent a notice to the “Neber Highest Republic of NAV”, an Internet goods transaction site at the Kakanam-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Seman Highest Republic of Korea”) to the victim E, who was posted a notice to purchase the Olympic Winter Winter Games through the said website, and then sent the victim 200,000 won to the Agricultural Cooperative account in F’s name on the same day.

However, even if the defendant receives the above money, he wishes to sell the victim's tweet to the victim.