손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant, in the order of sequence 1,481 square meters (attached Form 2) among the 1,2,3,6, and 1 square meters (attached Form 2), shall be the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the real estate listed in [Attachment 3] List No. 1 (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s real estate”), and the Defendant is the owner of the real estate listed in [Attachment 3] List No. 2 (hereinafter “Defendant’s real estate”).
Plaintiff
In addition, the Defendant’s real estate is the exclusive ownership of an aggregate building constructed on the land of 2,192 square meters in E, C, C, 1,481 square meters, D, 1,170 square meters, and D, and the Plaintiff owns the Plaintiff’s real estate. The Plaintiff owns the Plaintiff’s real estate with respect to E, E, E, 2,192 square meters, 69.086/2, with respect to C, 46.66/1,481 square meters, with respect to C, 46.66/1,481 square meters, and with respect to D, 1,170 square meters, 36.8756/1,170 square meters.
B. In the space between the Plaintiff’s real estate ceiling and the Defendant’s real estate floor, the part of the indication “B” on the ship that connects each point of “A” to each point in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, which connects each point of “A”, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 5 in sequence;
9. There are pipes for the part on board “C” which connects each point of November 9, 190 in sequence (hereinafter “instant pipes”). The instant pipes are linked to the Defendant’s real estate floor.
C. Meanwhile, on the ground of the land of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s real estate site (hereinafter “instant site”), the building indicated in Paragraph (1) of the Disposition, which is the Defendant’s ownership, is constructed adjacent to the Defendant’s real estate (hereinafter “instant extension”).
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 12, 13, evidence Nos. 1 through 10, evidence Nos. 14-1, 2, 3, and 15-1 through 9, the fact inquiry results on the realization market of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff's assertion
A. As to the claim for removal, the pipes of this case were installed without any title, which is the part of exclusive ownership, to exercise the Plaintiff’s ownership of the Plaintiff’s real estate.