Two blades (No. 1 and 2) confiscated by the defendant shall be confiscated.

On September 13, 2017, the Defendant, at around 03:28, at the Defendant’s residence located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul, and around 5, reported suicide of the Defendant 112, 2 knife knife (the total length of 29.5cc and the length of 18cc and the 33.4cm and the length of 20.4cm and the 20.4cm) of the knife, two knife, which are dangerous things to four, such as police officers belonging to the D District Unit E, and patrolmen, F, etc., of the Gyeonggi-gu, Police Station, which called out after receiving a report of suicide of the Defendant 112.

Madadadadada.

The term “intimidating” was expressed as a big interest.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photography photographs;

1. Article 144 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] : (a) where a person shows a group or a large group of persons (a person with a special aggravated punishment) or carries dangerous things, the subject of the aggravated punishment (a year to 4 years) (a) / (b) / (a) 27 times the defendant’s criminal experience; (c) / the defendant has a criminal experience of obstructing the performance of official duties; (d) / the criminal history of an act of violence reaches a majority; (e) / the criminal history of interfering with the performance of official duties by a large number of police officers; and (e) / the fact that a dangerous object interferes with the performance of official duties by a large number of police officers; (b) / The person is a shock crime under mainly taking action; (c) the defendant is threatened with the police officers; (d) the defendant misleads the police officers, misleads the police officers, and takes medical treatment for alcohol ozone; and

In addition, the records and records of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as favorable circumstances.