However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment of this case.

On November 21, 2008, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of occupational embezzlement at the Seoul Western District Court on August 21, 2008, and the above judgment was finalized on September 29, 2010. On September 9, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment for fraud in the same court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 17th of the same month.

Defendant

B On April 7, 2011, the same year is subject to a suspended sentence of 8 months of imprisonment for fraud in the same court.

8.26. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On February 27, 2007, the Defendants conspiredd to forge private document forgery and signed the F Office located in the second floor of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E-building, Seoul, on the location column of the real estate lease contract without authority for the purpose of exercising the right, and affixed without authority the seal impression of the said corporation’s name in the column of the deposit deposit amount, “Seoul-gu Seoul, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, G 205, 300,000”, “ from March 20, 2007 to March 20, 2009”, “Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, H15, and name IJ” on the part of the lessor column, and without permission, affixed the seal impression of the said corporation’s name.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a copy of the real estate lease agreement under the name of the JJ, a private document on the rights and obligations.

2. On February 28, 2007, the Defendants conspired and delivered to K a forged real estate lease agreement as stated in the above paragraph (1) as if they were duly formed.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use forged private documents.

3. The Defendants conspired to offer a lease contract in collusion with the victim K by paying a deposit of KRW 30 million at the time, place, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (2). In order to request the victim K to borrow money as security for the lease deposit, the Defendants issued a forged real estate lease contract in the same manner as the above paragraph (2) as security for the loan money, and its affiliation to the same account as L on the same day from the victim.