2. The defendant shall return to the plaintiff, Seopo-si C.

However, the person who acquired the right from the owner of unregistered real estate, such as the instant real estate, can independently complete the registration of ownership in subrogation of the owner’s right to apply for registration based on the right to request the registration after being sentenced to an order against the owner to implement the procedures for registration of ownership transfer. Thus, the part seeking the implementation of the registration of ownership preservation procedure against the

2. Part demanding the transfer registration of ownership;

A. The Plaintiff’s mother, the Plaintiff’s mother, and the Plaintiff occupied the instant real estate as its owner’s intention from June 21, 1965 to the date of the registration process with respect to the area of 1,712 square meters adjacent to the instant real estate in Seopopo City, Seopo-si.

Therefore, on June 21, 1985, the Plaintiff sought implementation of the ownership transfer registration procedure against the Defendant, who was the heir of the deceased F, who was the owner of the instant real estate.

(b) Judgment with no pleading on the ground of recognition (Articles 208(3)1 and 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. In conclusion, the part of the claim for registration of preservation of ownership in the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and dismissed, and the remainder of the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons indicated in the Disposition above.