2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, the amount of damage is not so much, the victim I paid the damage, and the above victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

However, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case at the same time during a period of repeated crime, not only has the history of fine, suspension of execution, and punishment, but also has the history of being sentenced to punishment, and also has committed each of the crimes of this case at the same time during the period of repeated crime, the victim C and F did not recover damage, the victim did not receive an appearance from the above victims, and there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the original judgment and the punishment at the trial, and other factors of the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court, such as the circumstances after the crime, are considered, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.