However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 16, 2013, the Defendant was the victim D (Nam, 51 years of age) and Si expenses while withdrawing cash from the cash payment instruments installed in the location of the “Cma” located in the Mandong-gu, Ansan-gu. B. The Defendant was the victim D (Nam, 51 years of age) and Si expenses.

At around 12:30 on the same day, the Defendant used a knife (32 cm in total length, 20 cm in a knife) which is a deadly weapon purchased in advance by the Defendant for the foregoing reasons as above, and said that he would be “be dead,” while finding the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a deadly weapon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined in light of the fact that the crime for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act is against the reason for sentencing and the victim does not want the punishment;