When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 7, 2014, the Defendant sent 2,200,000 won per head of the Tong from a person who was named in his/her name in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “Skwikset”) to a person who was named in his/her name. On January 7, 2014, around January 7, 2014, the Defendant transferred kwikset’s account (Account Number C), kwi’s account (Account Number D), kwi’s account, and kwi’s account, which are related means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes entered in an investigation report (Attachment of data on financial transaction information to a titleholder of a bankbook);

1. The pertinent provision of criminal facts and the indictment under Article 49(4) of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act regarding the selection of punishment are written as “paragraph 5,” but it is obvious that the indictment is a clerical error in the “paragraph 4.”

Sub-paragraph 1, Article 6(3)1 (Selection of Fines)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;