However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 13, 2016, around 03:25, the Defendant received a request from the injured party D (59 tax) of the victim D (E) in Macheon-si, the Defendant “the end of the business” from the injured party, and expressed the victim a bath, took the face in drinking, took the victim a face at a time, took off a steel with his/her chair, and went off his/her body, and her ice fice flas, and flads the victim’s clothes, and flads the victim’s clothes.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by the salt of the spawn that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An unfavorable circumstance is that the defendant can have the same record for the reasons for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Act on the observation of protection and community service order, the main sentence of Article 62-2(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59(1) of the same Act.

On the other hand, it is favorable for the defendant to recognize and reflect the crime of this case, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

The punishment for the prevention of recidivism shall be determined at once, in consideration of such circumstances and other various sentencing conditions as the family environment of the defendant, the motive of the crime, and the relationship with the victim.