When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 201, 201, at the request of the Defendant on February 2, 201, in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) had the victim C sell one of the freight vehicles owned by the victim; and (b) kept the vehicle for sale at a request from the victim C; (c) the same year.

4. Although the police officer demanded the return of the above cargo vehicle because he did not sell the vehicle from the victim of the Haman, he/she disposed of the vehicle without any justifiable reason and embezzled the above 3850,000 won of the cargo vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 355 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;