폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, at around 08:50 on September 4, 2017, hereinafter referred to as the “C main point of the Defendant’s work under Gui-si B’s 08:50 on September 4, 2017, hereinafter referred to as the “C main point of the Defendant’s day-to-day” 5IP 1, in which he talks with scromen, such as the victim D(34 tax) and talks with scrofs, and the Defendant, who was in scrofed, made a assault, such as taking the victim’s face into drinking,
This is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's explicit intent in accordance with Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code.
On October 13, 2017, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, a document stating that the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant was submitted to this court.
Therefore, this part of the public prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.