사해행위취소
1. The defendant of the plaintiff succeeding intervenor among the judgment of the first instance, including a claim for exchange change in this court.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows, except for a partial dismissal as follows, the part of “1. Basic Facts” from 4th to 3rd under the upper part of 9 upper part of the first instance judgment’s reasoning, and therefore, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.
[Supplementary part] Defendant B’s “Defendant C” is “B”, “Defendant C” is “C”, “Defendant Credit Guarantee Fund” is “Defendant”, and “Successor Intervenor” is both “Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor”.
In the first instance judgment No. 5 of the first instance judgment, “268,80,000” column 13 of the upper order No. 13 of the “loan Amount” column was “298,80,000”; “5,07,966” column 14 of the same table was “5,07,966”; “3,155,000,000” as “3,458,807,9666”; and “5,00” as “3,458,807,966.”
The "236,50,000" column 2 of the first instance judgment No. 6 table No. 2 of the first instance judgment shall be construed as "246,50,000"; the "B-1,7" column as "B-1, and the "298,80,000" column as "268,920,000" column 6 of the same table as "B68,920,000".
From June 19, 2015 to June 9, 2015, the 7th judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.
On June 19, 2015, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter “registration of the establishment of the first neighboring mortgage”) by the Seoul Southern District Court, Youngpo District Court No. 32653, Jun. 19, 2015, to the Defendant on June 19, 2015.
(2) On June 19, 2015, Cheongju District Court Decision 16930, Jun. 19, 2015, Cheongju District Court Decision 2000, 2000, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000,000,000,0000,000
(A) Nos. 8, 7, and 8 of the first instance judgment of "A, No. 3-1, 2)" shall be cut as follows.