When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 5. 26. 22:35경 파주시 적성면 구읍리 적성삼거리에서 음주운전으로 단속되어 파주경찰서 경비교통과 소속 경사 C이 음주측정을 하는 과정에서 음주측정 요구에 불응하여 경찰관이 이를 채증하자 자신의 휴대전화를 꺼내 들고 경찰관들을 촬영하면서 욕설을 하고 경사 C의 오른쪽 뺨을 3회 때리고, 발로 복부와 다리 부분을 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers for drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order assaults a police officer who requires a drinking test, and there is a need for a corresponding punishment in consideration of the characteristics of the crime of this case committed by the police officer carrying out legitimate public duties.

On the other hand, the defendant had been aware of the crime of this case in the court, and there was no criminal power prior to this case.

In addition, the conditions of sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, family relations, criminal records, the circumstances of this case, and the progress thereafter, shall be determined as the same sentence as the order.