However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 02:24 on July 7, 2018, the Defendant boarded at the front of the C Zone located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, on his/her boarding.

D A taxi engineer E arrives at the destination, and female customers are not able to sleep.

“Seoul, upon receipt of a report of 112, called “Seoul,” from F, a police officer belonging to the Pyeongtaek Police Station C District, “I will calculate taxi fares and return home,” and the victim was raised and seated.

The part of the F's right part of the elbow, i.e., "F. f. f. f. f. e. f. f. f. f. e. f. f. f. e. f. f. f. f. c.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 mobilization and measures by the victim who is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Considering that the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, given that the Defendant had several records of criminal punishment, such as violence, was committed against him/her, the degree of the exercise of tangible power exercised by him/her should be considered.