2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and divided the errors, and that the defendant deposited 7 million won for the victim C at the court below.

However, the Defendant: (a) was the victim of glass Cup and empty beer disease; (b) the method of committing the crime was dangerous; (c) the victim was fluencing the scarp in excess of 12 packed; and (d) the victim was injured by the victim; (b) the degree of such injury was significant; and (c) the Defendant showed violent inclinations, such as breaking the glass cup by hand, etc.; (d) the Defendant instructed the Defendant to make a false statement by calls to H and F, who was employed by the Defendant as an employee of the drinking house operated by the Defendant, to inform the Defendant of the contents investigated by the investigative agency and to make a statement in the same manner; (d) the Defendant was committed as a crime related to violence, and there was no prosecution authority; and (d) all the sentencing conditions of the lower court, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive for and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.