If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

The defendant is a person engaged in agriculture.

1. From early October 2013, the Defendant obstructed the traffic of the said C, etc. by installing a drum with a height of 1 meter from both sides of the runways, in order to prevent the passage of C (the age of 48), etc. (the age of 48), which does not have a good reputation on the alley in front of B B at Gyeongnam-do, from passing along the alleys.

2. An operator of image data processing equipment in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act shall not arbitrarily manipulate image data processing equipment for any purpose other than the intended purpose of installation, or shoot such equipment at a different place;

Nevertheless, from early October 2013, the Defendant installed CCTV camera in front of the house of the victim C(48 years of age) in a warehouse managed by the Defendant in front of the house of the victim C(48 years of age) and taken the front end of the house of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on filing of a complaint, relevant photographs, and investigative reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 185 of the Criminal Act, Article 72 subparagraph 1 of the Personal Information Protection Act, and Article 25 (5) of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (the purpose other than the purpose of shooting visual data processing devices), the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.