위증
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) visited D’s Lestop of D operation on the Tenth floor of the building E (10th floor in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si; (c) and there is absence of D; and (d) the Defendant: (a) carried out documents, such as a written confirmation of attempted construction payments (the amount is stated as KRW 56,50,000 without the date of preparation; hereinafter “written confirmation of attempted construction payments”); (d) carried out the said Estop; and (e) again, submitted to the court a written confirmation of attempted construction payments of this case signed and sealed by D from the person who was not injured; and (e) signed and sealed by D on May 12, 2005, sealed D’s seal affixed with the written confirmation of attempted construction payments of this case to F as of May 12, 2005; and (e) the Defendant, as a person who actually signed and sealed D construction payments of this case.
Therefore, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, although the defendant appeared as a witness of the Incheon District Court 201 High Court 201 High Court 215 High Court 201 High Court 201 High Court 201 High Court 201 High Court 201 High Court 201 High Court
2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness with respect to the above court's fraud, etc. against the above court's 201 high-ranking 215C at around 10:30 on November 16, 201, at the Incheon District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's 10:30 on November 16, 201.
A witness, stating that “the amount of the construction work that he received,” requested the defendant to prepare a draft written confirmation of attempted construction, and a witness who does not have to do so shall obtain the said draft from the defendant and obtain a DNA seal and signature after obtaining confirmation from D.