beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.06 2016가단113259

용역비

Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 6,996,00 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from May 27, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. On November 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around the period of the compressing machine, while the strawing part of the scam ton part of the compressing machine was worn out; (b) requested the Plaintiff to replace the scam part of the scamn part of the compressing machine; and (c) requested the Plaintiff to replace the scam part of the scamn part of the compressing machine; and (d) the Plaintiff re-scamed the relevant scamn part of the scamn part that the Defendant purchased with

(2) At the time, the Plaintiff’s employees requested repair to the Plaintiff on May 26, 2015, and the Plaintiff’s employees requested repair due to the decomposition of the compressors. As a result of the analysis, the Plaintiff’s employees found that there was a serious impact on the cryption in the compressors in the compressors, and expanded the inner diameter of the compressors from 0340 to 0350 (the removal of the cryping part of the cryption part), and developed the cryption to the cryption ton (the removal of the cryp part of the cryption part), and then, the parts of the cryping part should be changed to the cryping part (the cryping part) with the cryping part (the cryping part) in the cryping part (the cryping part).

Since one week has not elapsed, the same problem, such as the shot in the compressors, occurred, the defendant requested the plaintiff to repair the plaintiff at the time of the plaintiff's fault in repair. When the plaintiff refused it, the same repair was equally accepted by the plaintiff in the non-party B around June 23, 2015 (the inside diameter is larger than 0360, the inside diameter is larger, and the ston development is also the same problem).