A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case and the fact that the defendant deposited KRW 1.5 million for the victim E, the victim C, M, K, and N for the victim E, and that the defendant has no criminal record of being punished by imprisonment without prison labor or a heavier punishment due to the same kind of crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, since the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the following is ruled again

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged by the defendant and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are the same as the corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; Article 151, Article 152 Subparag. 1, Article 43, and Article 148-2 Subparag. 1, and Article 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 10790, Jun. 8, 201; hereinafter the same shall apply);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision on the Grounds for Appeal);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation, etc. Act to provide community service or attend lectures;