When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is a member of the F church belonging to D religious organization E.

On July 30, 2016, the Defendant, within H church located in Ischeon-si G on July 20, 2016, was in office as the husband of the victim I, and did not comply with the judgment of dismissal, payment of trial expenses, and withdrawal from the churchhouse of the D Religious E trial committee due to the Defendant’s complaint, and did not comply with it even though he received the above H church E trial committee’s dismissal, payment of the trial expenses, and the leave from the churchhouse of the above H church, and received a decision of suspension of compulsory execution from the D Maintenance Foundation, a foundation that owns the above H church’s building and the land until the decision of suspension of execution was made by the time when the request for provisional disposition was made. However, even though the Defendant did not have committed the act of moving the property owned by the victim and J, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim, including the victim, who did not have committed the act of moving the property owned by the victim and J outside of the church.

J It refers to the hearing of Symnamera as Sym.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement by the defendant partially stating that he/she has made the words as stated in the ruling at the time and place;

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and defense counsel in the police statement protocol against I

1. The summary of the argument is that the husband of the victim of the victim's association which is the fact that the victim is not guilty, or there is a justifiable reason to believe that the victim has been in bad faith, and in order to confirm clearly that the victim does not have the right to possess the church housing, etc., the defendant of the Republic of Korea has the intention to impair the honor because it is confirmed that the victim has the right to possess the church housing.

The defendant cannot be seen at the time of ‘Ch' or ‘C'.