양도소득세등부과처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is partially dismissed as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as follows, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment, which is set forth in paragraph (2) below, to the defense prior to the merits rendered by the head of Yangcheon-gu Office in the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2)
At the bottom of the third part of the judgment of the first instance (except for each part), the phrase “(Supreme Court 2015Da233005)” is added to the following:
The fourth 8-9 of the judgment of the first instance, “B made the registration of ownership transfer of the instant real estate” was revised to read “B made the registration of ownership transfer on December 27, 2016, namely, Supreme Court Decision 2015Da23305 Decided December 27, 2016; Seoul High Court Decision 2014Na2021081 (principal lawsuit); and Seoul High Court Decision 2014Na2015Na209545 (Counterclaim).”
5 pages 1 through 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written with "Evidences 1 through 16 of the first instance".
The letter 7-8 and 8-10 of the first instance judgment " December 17, 2016" shall be applied respectively to " December 27, 2016."
Then, from the 7th bottom of the judgment of the first instance to 5, “hickly” was added to “(the assertion that C is the actual owner of the instant real estate and the title trust of the Plaintiff is not accepted in the relevant judgment. In addition, the provisional registration of B appears to be the provisional registration of security completed for the purpose of securing the claim for indemnity against the Defendant when B pays off the Plaintiff’s debt to E in lieu of the Plaintiff’s loan.”
The following shall be added to the seven last sentence of the first instance judgment:
The plaintiff asserts that the transfer price of the real estate in this case was transferred to C with the dividends of deposited settlement money claim, but the provisional seizure creditor is merely deposited without the direct payment of the amount of dividends (Article 160 (1) 2 of the Civil Execution Act). Thus, the plaintiff did not have the title of execution.