이단 시비에 관한 심판 청구
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
. Facts of recognition.
A. The Plaintiff is a believers who lives with a religious life at a local school within the territory of the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant is an educational foundation that establishes and operates a D University.
B. On April 2010, the Defendant’s school pastor E stated that the students were at the time of “the Dogdoglon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’
Majors * G* Contents of Resolution of Major H* * this part - ancients and integration-related institutions* Korea Uniforms Institute, and Edial G major contents of the Restoration Station * Indunesism, I argued that human beings should be the same as Nar., I explain to Nar, and describe that human nature of Pardo is incomplete.
* The Gisung Council was called as the Gisung Women of the Belgium, and denied pastors, worships, etc.
The activity method* the name of BSG, EBS, etc. in the university and is a sexual intercourse.
* Publication and distribution of various books, and sporessing and changing activities.
* The Seoul Educational Association, Gwangju Educational Association, Daegu Educational Association, etc.) makes use of the regional names available to the church.
C. In addition, on March 2015, E had distributed printed materials of the title “F” published by the Private Institutes Uniforms Council as a lecture supporting materials (hereinafter “instant printed materials”) to students during the time of the opening of a police officer in the middle of the police officer.
The printed matter of this case is indicated as follows with respect to local churches:
From May 6, 2010 to April 28, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a certificate of content to the president of D University on several occasions, and requested that D University students take part in the local school group, and E-Woo recognized the local school group as a local school group, and the local school group is not an interest.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of the Plaintiff’s assertion E of the Plaintiff’s religious room E is from the sexual border.