beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.07.25 2017고단155

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, on July 26, 2016, 02:40 around 06, 2016, in the “E” car page located in the territory of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, whether the Defendants, “the Defendants, by suffering from patient uniforms, drinked alcoholic beverages.”

“A victim’s horses f.o.b. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Nonson’s superior refers to “Apson’s breath,” and the Defendant B, by hand, dumped the victim’s bomb, and dumped the victim’s bomb with her hand, and her bomb and her bombed with her hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up the climatic dump in need of approximately three weeks of treatment to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Photographs and written diagnosis of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The defendant A asserts to the effect that the decision on the argument of mental and physical weakness under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act was in a state of mental and physical weakness due to brain damage, etc.

In light of the records, it is recognized that the defendant had been in need of pharmacologic treatment and progress observation due to symptoms, such as disorder in emotional distress after two symptoms in the past, but it is difficult to view that the defendant's ability to discern things or make decisions has reached a weak state in light of the circumstances and contents of this case. Thus, the above assertion is rejected.

The reason for sentencing is contingent crimes caused by minor urgency, and the defendants are divided into the defendants, the damage is minor and the victim does not want to be punished, the defendant B does not have any same power, and the age, sex, environment, and environment of the defendants.