When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.096% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.096% on January 10, 2015, and led the Defendant to drive five lanes in front of the Songpa-gu Seoul Olympic Winter-ro 99 (Ompik-dong) along three lanes from the 19,000 new river.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely maintaining the safety distance with the front and rear left, and driving safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected his duty of care under the influence of alcohol.

In the same direction, the victim C, who was in the atmosphere of the signal, was found to be late behind the driver's vehicle, and the victim C was driven by the driver's vehicle in the front part of the driver's vehicle operated by the defendant.

The damaged vehicle due to the shock has become a driver after the FNAS car driven by the victim E while the damaged vehicle was pushed in the future.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim C, such as dysplates, salt sprinks, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of treatment on the part of the victim G, suffered injury on the part of the victim G, such as dyplate splates, salt sprinks, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim E, injury on the part of the fypumum in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim H, and injury on the part of the victim I, such as the fypumum, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in C, G, and E;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Report on actions taken against an employer, and report on the status of an employer-employed driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;