(a) remove each real estate listed in the annex 1 list;

(b)each entry in the separate sheet 2.

A. On January 5, 2006, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of “the donation on December 25, 2005,” with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

B. On March 20, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant with respect to each of the instant real estate without any deposit and rent, and without any rent, the term of existence: from March 20, 2006 to March 19, 201; and from March 19, 201, if the lessee wishes to do so, it may be extended once (five years). An order is issued without any condition at the time of termination of the contract. The lease agreement with the terms and conditions of the lease (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”) was concluded, and delivered each of the instant real estate to the Defendant on the same day.

Since then, the instant lease contract was extended once more.

C. On the other hand, in addition to each real estate of this case, the defendant is not more than the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list on the ground of the land listed in the attached Table 2 list No. 1.

) New construction and use of this. [The facts of no dispute between the parties to the basis of recognition, the entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, 13, and 14, the result of the request for appraisal by this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on March 19, 2016, the Defendant is obligated to remove each warehouse and entrance of this case to the Plaintiff, deliver each of the real estate of this case to the Plaintiff, and return the profits gained from possession and use of each of the real estate of this case to the completion date of delivery of each of the real estate of this case without any justifiable title from March 20, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of each of

Furthermore, with respect to the amount of unjust enrichment to be returned by the Defendant, the amount of profit from the possession and use of each of the instant real property shall be equivalent to the rent. According to the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal of rent, the monthly rent for each of the instant real property from August 26, 2016 to August 25, 2017, which is close to the date of closing the argument in this case, shall be 683.