However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 15, 2017, the Defendant 02:46 on April 15, 2017, the Defendant had been fighting between customers in front of the Manan-gu C.

Mader's disease shall be broken and sculed.

The 112 report called "4 persons" was sent to the site, and the security guards E, who are the police officers belonging to the police department of the Ansan-gu Police Station, did not deal with the reported case at one time, and the background E recorded the defendant's act using a mobile phone in order to secure evidence, and assaulted the E's loss in the circumstance where the victim's spawn swn's cell phone was found.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendations given in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (from June 1 to June 1), the basic area (the decision of sentencing) of types 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties) [the decision of sentencing] - The degree of assault is not somewhat unfavorable. - The favorable circumstances are that the defendant recognizes the crime and reflects it.